大学士考试网

考研动态 考研英语 考研政治 考研数学 专业课 模拟试题 历年真题

考研英语复习资料:读译参考——烟草公司日子不好过

考研英语  时间: 2019-03-08 16:59:20  作者: 匿名 
A question of standards
一个关乎标准的问题

Feb 9th 2006
From The Economist Global Agenda

More suggestions of bad behaviour by tobacco companies. Maybe
也许,烟草公司对那些不良行为应多提点建议

ANOTHER round has just been fought in the battle between tobacco companies and those who regard them as spawn of the devil. In a paper just published in the Lancet, with the provocative title “Secret science: tobacco industry research on smoking behaviour and cigarette toxicity”, David Hammond, of *Waterloo University[1] in Canada and Neil Collishaw and Cynthia Callard, two members of Physicians for a Smoke-Free Canada, a lobby group, criticise the behaviour of British American Tobacco (BAT). They say the firm considered manipulating some of its products in order to (1)make them low-tar in the eyes of officialdom while they actually delivered high tar and nicotine levels to smokers.
烟草公司与那些视其为“魔鬼之子”的人之间刚刚又进行了新一轮的交锋。新近出版的《柳叶刀》刊登了一篇题目颇具煽动性的论文《秘密科研——烟草业开展对吸烟行为和香烟毒性的研究》,作者是加拿大沃特鲁大学的戴维 哈蒙德以及加拿大一个名为“无烟加拿大医师”游说团的两名成员尼尔 科里肖和辛西娅 加拉德。他们对英美烟草公司的行为提出了批评,称该公司拟对某些烟草产品进行处理,企图让监督部门误以为其焦油含量低,而实际上这些产品仍会使得烟民吸收高浓度的焦油和尼古丁。

猜你喜欢

精选专题